What is the most accurate hardness tester?
Brinell scale - Wikipedia
AJR supply professional and honest service.
"BHN" redirects here. For other uses, see BHN (disambiguation)
Force diagramThe Brinell scale characterizes the indentation hardness of materials through the scale of penetration of an indenter, loaded on a material test-piece. It is one of several definitions of hardness in materials science.
History
[
edit
]
Proposed by Swedish engineer Johan August Brinell in , it was the first widely used and standardised hardness test in engineering and metallurgy. The large size of indentation and possible damage to test-piece limits its usefulness. However, it also had the useful feature that the hardness value divided by two gave the approximate UTS in ksi for steels. This feature contributed to its early adoption over competing hardness tests.
Test details
[
edit
]
The typical test uses a 10 mm (0.39 in) diameter steel ball as an indenter with a 3,000 kgf (29.42 kN; 6,614 lbf) force. For softer materials, a smaller force is used; for harder materials, a tungsten carbide ball is substituted for the steel ball. The indentation is measured and hardness calculated as:
BHN = 2 P π D ( D D 2 d 2 ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {BHN} ={\frac {2P}{\pi D\left(D-{\sqrt {D^{2}-d^{2}}}\right)}}}
where:
- BHN = Brinell Hardness Number (kgf/mm2)
- P = applied load in kilogram-force (kgf)
- D = diameter of indenter (mm)
- d = diameter of indentation (mm)
Brinell hardness is sometimes quoted in megapascals; the Brinell hardness number is multiplied by the acceleration due to gravity, 9. m/s2, to convert it to megapascals.
The Brinell hardness number can be correlated with the ultimate tensile strength (UTS), although the relationship is dependent on the material, and therefore determined empirically. The relationship is based on Meyer's index (n) from Meyer's law. If Meyer's index is less than 2.2 then the ratio of UTS to BHN is 0.36. If Meyer's index is greater than 2.2, then the ratio increases.
The Brinell hardness is designated by the most commonly used test standards (ASTM E10-14 and ISO 1:) as HBW (H from hardness, B from brinell and W from the material of the indenter, tungsten (wolfram) carbide). In former standards HB or HBS were used to refer to measurements made with steel indenters.
HBW is calculated in both standards using the SI units as
HBW = 0.102 2 F π D ( D D 2 d 2 ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {HBW} =0.102{\frac {2F}{\pi D\left(D-{\sqrt {D^{2}-d^{2}}}\right)}}}
where:
- F = applied load (newtons)
- D = diameter of indenter (mm)
- d = diameter of indentation (mm)
Common values
[
edit
]
When quoting a Brinell hardness number (BHN or more commonly HB), the conditions of the test used to obtain the number must be specified. The standard format for specifying tests can be seen in the example "HBW 10/". "HBW" means that a tungsten carbide (from the chemical symbol for tungsten or from the Spanish/Swedish/German name for tungsten, "Wolfram") ball indenter was used, as opposed to "HBS", which means a hardened steel ball. The "10" is the ball diameter in millimeters. The "" is the force in kilograms force.
The hardness may also be shown as XXX HB YYD2. The XXX is the force to apply (in kgf) on a material of type YY (5 for aluminum alloys, 10 for copper alloys, 30 for steels). Thus a typical steel hardness could be written: 250 HB 30D2. It could be a maximum or a minimum.
Correspondent relations among scale, indenter and test force: Hardness symbol Diameter of Indentermm
F/D2 Test forceN/kgf
Contact us to discuss your requirements of Magnetic Particle Inspection. Our experienced sales team can help you identify the options that best suit your needs.
HBW 10/ 10 30 () HBW 10/ 10 15 () HBW 10/ 10 10 ()Standards
[
edit
]
See also
[
edit
]
References
[
edit
]
Which Hardness Tester Scale Is More Accurate - Metsuco
There are 3 common material hardness tests, Vickers, Rockwell, and Brinell, each with their different ways of testing and scale. That begs the question, which hardness tester scale Is more accurate?
What is Material Hardness?
Hardness describes a characteristic quality of a material, not an intrinsic physical property. In other words, you might change the hardness of a steel plate by heating or hammering it without changing its molecular composition. A materials hardness is defined by its resistance to indentation, which can be found by measuring the depth of a permanent indentation. When you apply a known, predefined force using a particular indenter, the depth of the indentation will be inversely proportional to the materials hardness.
What is Hardness Testing?
Hardness testers are machines that test materials to verify their current physical characteristics and performance under predictable circumstances. Over the years, several methods have been developed to test the hardness of industrial materials. Because materials can vary in sample size, thickness, regularity, texture, scale, and so on, the suitability and accuracy of a given testing method depend on how well it is matched to a material. For instance, materials with a small grain or very small parts may respond differently to a cone-shaped indenter than they do to a spherical indenter.
What Differentiates the Hardness Testing Methods?
If we consider the Vickers, Rockwell, and Brinell hardness testing methods, we will see that each has a distinctive indenter and means of applying force to a given material. We do a deep dive into the differences in our post Brinell, Rockwell, and Vickers Hardness Tests: The Differences Explained. However, below is a summary of each testing method.
Vickers Hardness Testing
The Vickers hardness test is often described as a microhardness test. The ASTM E-384 test procedure applies a square pyramid-shaped diamond indenter in conjunction with a relatively light load up to 1 kgf to a sample, then takes an optical measurement of the depression to determine the materials hardness. The Vickers method can accurately test the hardness of small, highly polished metal, ceramic, or composite parts. It is easy to implement, and the same indenter can be applied to different materials with varying hardness degrees.
Although Vickers hardness testing can be used for a wide range of applications, there are certain factors that should be considered for each test case. Preparing and testing the sample can be a time-consuming endeavor. The sample needs to be sectioned to fit and carefully mounted to be perpendicular to the testing platform to ensure the test load will be evenly distributed. It also needs to be polished so that the depression will be regularly shaped and measurable. The surface area of the indentation should be as large as possible. Because many of the preparation, testing, and measuring steps are performed by human operators, it can be challenging to keep the process free from error.
Rockwell Hardness Testing
The most commonly applied and generally accurate hardness test is the Rockwell test, as defined in ASTM E-18. This test measures the permanent depth of an indentation made by applying a designated force to the indenter, then derives the samples hardness by calculating the difference between the baseline and final depth measurements and converting this figure to a hardness number. This test is usually easy to perform on any soft or hard metal with a relatively uniform surface, unless the indenter is too large for the sample size or the shape of the sample is unsuitable.
The Rockwell method uses a conical, round-tipped diamond or a ball indenter to apply a preliminary force, or minor load, of 3 to 10 kgf to a sample for a specified dwell time. This step diminishes the effects that a surface finish could have on perceived or performative hardness. After holding the preliminary test force for a specified dwell time, the depression is measured as a baseline. Once this figure is recorded, a secondary force, called the major load, is applied and held for a predetermined dwell time so that the sample can undergo elastic recovery. Together, the minor and major loads comprise the total necessary test load, which can range from 15 to 150 kgf or 500 to kgf, depending on the particularities of the test.
When the major load is released, the tester returns to the preliminary load and holds it for a designated dwell time, after which the tester removes the load and measures the final depth of the depression. Since the hardness value corresponds to the maximum depth of the depression, it is directly readable and does not require a diagonal scale or instrumental optical evaluation. The simplified measuring technique reduces the chance of a reading error when assessing test results.
The depth of the indentation must not exceed the thickness of the test specimen, and the indenter cannot press too close to the edge of the sample. The surface of the specimen and test anvil must be free of dirt and debris. The indenter should be perpendicular to the test platform to ensure proper loading and impression. If the hardness of the sample is not uniform, the test will measure the average hardness of the sample, and the overall accuracy of the test may be called into question.
Brinell Hardness Testing
As defined in ASTM E10, the Brinell hardness testing method is generally used to test cast or forged materials with rough or coarse surfaces. This test utilizes a high load 500 to kgf load and a large ball indenter up to 10mm diameter to create an impression. The ball indenter that is pressed into the sample is held for a fixed period of time and then removed. The indentation is optically measured across at least two diameters using a specially designed Brinell microscope or other optical systems. The indentation is measured to produce an average result that accounts for the samples textural inconsistencies. These results are then converted to their corresponding Brinell hardness numbers.
When testing coarse materials, the Brinell hardness test can be more accurate than the Rockwell test because the ball indenter evenly distributes pressure across the sample. It remains essential to carefully prepare the sample and clean the test surface to produce viable indentations. The test also has the disadvantage of being somewhat time-consuming, and since different operators may cause inconsistencies in a range of measurements, Brinell test results can vary even under ideal conditions. Poor preparation and technique can greatly increase the potential for error. Automatic optical Brinell scopes and computer image analysis can help operators ensure that they are taking consistent, standardized readings.
For Accurate Results, Match Your Hardness Testing Method to Your Material
In the end, there really is no consensus on which hardness testing is the most accurate. A Brinell hardness tester can test all types of metals. Some consider the results of the Brinell method more accurate and reliable than those obtained by the Rockwell method because of the use of a spherical indenter that distributes pressure evenly. However, others think the Rockwell test is generally easier to perform, and more accurate than other types of hardness testing methods. Objectively speaking, the accuracy of a testing method largely depends on the suitability of the relationship between the test method and the characteristics of the sample material. Good results also depend on the work of qualified operators who can consistently manage the testing protocol and procedures and deliver reliable results. When you are aware of the properties of the materials that need testing, you should easily be able to select the hardness test that is best suited for your application.
METSUCO has been a leading supplier of hardness testing machines and blocks for over 30 years. We serve not only industries such as oil and gas, aerospace, automotive, and heavy manufacturing, but also universities and quality testing labs. Call 713-827- or with inquiries.
Comments
0