Login

Your Name:(required)

Your Password:(required)

Join Us

Your Name:(required)

Your Email:(required)

Your Message :

Powered vs Manual: Which Endoscopic Staplers are Better?

Author: Helen

Jul. 09, 2024

35 0 0

Ezisurg Product Page

Q: Powered vs Manual: Which Endoscopic Staplers are Better?

A: Both powered and manual endoscopic staplers have advantages and disadvantages and are suitable for different situations. Understanding the differences between the two can help surgeons make an informed decision.

Q1: What are endoscopic staplers?

A: Endoscopic staplers are surgical instruments used to create anastomoses, resections, and transections in minimally invasive surgery. They are designed to staple and cut tissue simultaneously, creating a seal to prevent bleeding and reducing the risk of infection.

Q2: What are manual endoscopic staplers?

A: Manual endoscopic staplers are staples that are fired manually by the surgeon after being loaded with staples and a blade. They are lightweight, portable and relatively inexpensive. Benefits include ease of use, reduced fatigue, and uniformity of the staple line. However, manual stapling can be limited in occasions such as large-caliber endoluminal anastomoses, complex gastric resections, and in laparoscopic-assisted procedures with deep surgical fields.

Q3: What are powered endoscopic staplerspowered endoscopic staplers?

A: Powered endoscopic staplers are staplers that are powered by a motor and a reloadable magazine. This design reduces surgeon hand fatigue and offers consistent performance for the duration of the procedure. The powered endoscopic staplers are typically used in minimally invasive surgical procedures, resulting in a shorter operative time and improved clinical outcomes. However, powered endoscopic staplers are relatively complex and can be more expensive, so hospitals must assess the potential benefits against the additional costs.

Q4: Are there any complications with endoscopic staplers?

A: As with any surgical procedure, there may be complications with endoscopic staplers. Common complications include stapler misfiring, postoperative leakage, bleeding, and strictures. There have also been reports of staplers being retained after surgery, which have led to additional surgical procedures. It is important for surgeons to receive adequate training in the use of endoscopic staplers and to follow the recommended instructions for use carefully.

Conclusion:

Both powered and manual endoscopic staplers are important tools for minimally invasive surgery, and each has its benefits and disadvantages. Surgeons must choose the right endoscopic stapler for the procedure based on individual patient needs. Although endoscopic staplers can be associated with complications, proper technique and training can help to minimize risks and improve clinical outcomes.

View Details

Comments

0

0/2000